Private WAN with QoS, Deterministic Paths & Carrier-Backed SLAs
MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching) delivers a private, carrier-managed WAN with Quality of Service (QoS), traffic engineering, and contracted SLAs. Itβs the right tool when you need predictable latency, class-of-service guarantees, and segmented L3VPNs between sitesβespecially for real-time apps and regulated environments.
- π (888) 765-8301
- βοΈ contact@solveforce.com
Where this fits in the SolveForce model:
π Connectivity (Grammar) β Connectivity β’ π§ Fabric β Networks & Data Centers
βοΈ Cloud (Syntax) β Cloud β’ π Security (Semantics) β Cybersecurity
π Overlay interop β SD-WAN β’ SASE β’ Routing β BGP Management
π― Outcomes (What MPLS Delivers)
- Deterministic paths with carrier traffic engineering and predictable latency/jitter.
- QoS enforcement end-to-end for voice/video/transaction flows (EF/AF/BE classes).
- L3VPN segmentation between sites/business units without Internet exposure.
- Strong SLAs for availability, latency, jitter, and Mean Time To Restore (MTTR).
- Coexistence with SD-WAN/SASE for hybrid underlay architectures.
π§ When to Choose MPLS (and When to Pair It)
Choose MPLS when you need:
- Strict QoS guarantees for real-time apps (voice trading floors, telemedicine, SCADA).
- Regulatory isolation (finance/health/public sector) without DIY encryption on every hop.
- Predictable inter-site performance with committed SLAs.
Pair with SD-WAN/SASE when you want:
- Dual-/multi-underlay resilience (MPLS + DIA + Fixed Wireless/5G) with app-aware steering. β SD-WAN
- Cloud breakout policies near SaaS/IaaS while private flows stay on MPLS. β SASE β’ Cloud
π§± MPLS Service Types (Spelled Out)
- L3VPN (Layer-3 VPN) β the carrier routes IP between your sites inside private VRFs (Virtual Routing and Forwarding). Your edges run BGP/OSPF toward the provider PE; the carrier handles the core.
- VPLS (Virtual Private LAN Service) β Layer-2 βvirtual switchβ that extends Ethernet across sites (LAN-like behavior). β VPLS
- Pseudowires (L2VPN/VPWS) β point-to-point Ethernet circuits over MPLS when you need simple L2 adjacency.
- Traffic Engineering (TE) β carrier-side capacity planning; some providers offer RSVP-TE or Segment Routing (SR-MPLS) for explicit constraints on premium paths.
Encryption note: MPLS is private, not encrypted by default. Add IPsec/MACsec where policy demands. β Encryption
ποΈ QoS & Classes of Service (CoS)
Typical CoS tiers (provider-specific names vary):
Class (example) | Intended Traffic | Markings (example) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
EF (Expedited Forwarding) | Voice/telepresence | DSCP EF (46), 802.1p 5 | Strict priority, low-latency queue |
AF (Assured Forwarding) | Interactive apps (Citrix/EMR, control) | DSCP AF2x/AF3x | Bandwidth guarantees, low drop |
BE (Best Effort) | Bulk/file/backup | DSCP 0, scavenger as needed | No guarantees |
Best practice:
- Classify/mark at the edge (trusted boundary), honor at WAN egress.
- Police scavenger/bulk classes; protect EF from starvation with precise shaping.
- Validate CoS with synthetics per class; publish per-class SLOs.
π SLO Guardrails (Recommended Targets)
Metric | Metro (Class A) | Regional (Class B) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
One-way Latency | β€ 2β5 ms | 15β35 ms | Per route class (95th percentile) |
Jitter | β€ 15% latency | β€ 15% | EF must remain tight for voice |
Packet Loss | < 0.1% | < 0.1% | Per class; watch EF drops |
Availability | 99.95β99.99% | 99.9β99.95% | Depends on design/protection |
MTTR | β€ 4 hours | β€ 4β8 hours | Confirm provider SLA clauses |
We enforce SLOs via continuous synthetics/telemetry and open carrier tickets on breach. β NOC Services β’ Circuit Monitoring
π Edge & Routing Patterns
- PEβCE Routing: eBGP preferred (policy clarity, fast withdraws); OSPF as alternative where required.
- VRF Design: isolate business units/crown-jewel apps; route-leaking only where justified.
- Anycast Front Doors: publish identical VIPs from multiple hubs; withdraw on health. β BGP Management
- Hybrid Underlay: MPLS + Fiber DIA + Fixed Wireless/5G; SD-WAN steers per app/SLO. β Fiber Internet β’ Fixed Wireless β’ Mobile Connectivity
βοΈ Cloud & On-Ramps (Hybrid Reality)
- Keep private app flows on MPLS; burst/extend to cloud via Direct Connect/ExpressRoute/Interconnect at a carrier-dense colo. β Direct Connect β’ Colocation
- Use regional hubs near cloud regions; terminate MPLS there and apply breakout policy.
- For Internet-first SaaS, SD-WAN/SASE local breakout usually beats hair-pinning over MPLS.
π Security Considerations (Private β Encrypted)
- Add encryption where policy requires: IPsec over MPLS for sensitive flows; MACsec for L2 handoffs. β Encryption
- Zero Trust for users/admins: ZTNA instead of flat VPN; PAM for elevated tasks. β ZTNA β’ PAM
- Segmentation: VRF at WAN + microsegmentation in DC/cloud for lateral-movement control. β Microsegmentation
- Evidence: stream logs/flows to SIEM/SOAR. β SIEM / SOAR
π§ͺ Reference Designs (By Outcome)
A) Voice-First Branches
- MPLS with EF class for voice; DIA as secondary; SD-WAN packet duplication for calls on brownout; local SaaS breakout.
B) Regulated Backbone (Finance/Healthcare)
- L3VPN VRFs per domain; IPsec for PHI/PAN; DR hubs in colocation with Direct Connect to cloud records. β Colocation β’ Direct Connect
C) Cloud-Centric Enterprise
- MPLS to hub sites only; branches run Internet underlay + SD-WAN/SASE; private apps hair-pin to hub; everything else exits local.
π οΈ Turn-Up & Operations
- Design β VRF plan, CoS matrix, PE-CE routing (BGP), address/CIDR map.
- Order β MPLS tails per site, diversity letters, on-ramp ports, cross-connects.
- Provision β PE-CE sessions, VRFs, QoS policy, CoS marking rules, telemetry.
- Test β RFC 2544 / ITU-T Y.1564 baselines per class; synthetics for EF/AF/BE.
- Observe β tie metrics into NOC dashboards; per-class alarms; monthly SLA reviews.
- Improve β shift traffic policy from data; upgrade underlays where chronic.
π΅ Commercial Notes
- Ports & tails per site; Class-of-Service uplift affects price.
- Terms typically 24β60 months; NRC for install; MRC per tail.
- Diversity (dual carriers/paths/metros) adds cost but raises availability.
- Hybrid saves β combine MPLS (critical) + DIA (bulk/SaaS) with SD-WAN policy.
β Pre-Engagement Checklist
- π Sites, bandwidth tiers, latency classes (A/B/C), and critical apps.
- π§ VRF & CoS policy (EF/AF/BE allocations; policing/shaping plan).
- π PE-CE routing (BGP vs OSPF), Anycast needs, route-leak exceptions.
- π Security overlay (IPsec/MACsec, ZTNA/PAM, segmentation).
- βοΈ Cloud on-ramp strategy (which hubs/metros, which regions).
- π Synthetics & SLO definitions; evidence/reporting cadence.
π Where MPLS Fits (Recursive View)
1) Grammar β private transport rules in Connectivity
2) Syntax β predictable site-to-site flows supporting Cloud architectures
3) Semantics β integrity via CoS enforcement + optional encryption β Cybersecurity
4) Pragmatics β signals for SolveForce AI to steer/forecast
5) Foundation β consistent terms under Primacy of Language
6) Map β indexed across the SolveForce Codex & Knowledge Hub
π Design an MPLS or Hybrid WAN You Can Prove
- π (888) 765-8301
- βοΈ contact@solveforce.com
Related pages:
Connectivity β’ VPLS β’ SD-WAN β’ SASE β’ Direct Connect β’ Colocation β’ Fiber Internet β’ Fixed Wireless β’ Mobile Connectivity β’ Satellite Internet β’ NOC Services β’ Circuit Monitoring