🧩 Microsegmentation

Least-Privilege Network Access for Apps, Users & Workloads

Microsegmentation prevents lateral movement by enforcing least-privilege network policy—between users → apps, workload → workload, tier → tier, and device → service—on premises, in cloud, and across Kubernetes.
SolveForce designs microsegmentation that’s identity-aware, posture-aware, and auditable—integrated with ZTNA/SASE, NAC, EDR/XDR, and SIEM/SOAR—so you can contain breaches, pass audits, and ship changes safely.

Where this fits in our model:
🔒 Security (Semantics)Cybersecurity • 🔐 Per-Session AccessZTNA / SASE
👤 Identity/PostureIAM / SSO / MFAMDM / UEMEDR / MDR / XDR
🖧 FabricNetworks & Data Centers • 🔀 TransportSD-WAN • 🚪 EdgeNAC
📊 Evidence & AutomationSIEM / SOAR • 🖧 East–West DetectionNDR


🎯 Outcomes (Why Microsegmentation)

  • Containment by default — block lateral movement; allow only required flows.
  • Identity- & posture-aware — rules bind to user/group, workload/service, and device health.
  • Uniform model — one least-privilege approach across DC, cloud, K8s, campus, and remote.
  • Audit-ready — policy as code, change diffs, enforcement logs to SIEM.
  • Safer changes — staged rollouts, simulation/dry-run, automatic rollback via SOAR.

🧭 Scope (What We Segment)

  • User → App (Access Edge) — staff/contractors to specific apps only, never to subnets. → ZTNASASE
  • Workload → Workload (East–West) — app tiers (web↔app↔DB), microservices, API backends.
  • Zone → Zone (Macro) — PCI/PHI/CUI zones, admin/privileged networks, OT/IT boundaries.
  • Device Classes — corp laptops vs BYOD; IoT/OT (cameras, printers, POS, sensors) isolated by purpose. → NAC

🧱 Building Blocks (Spelled Out)

  • Policy Abstractions — define intentions as Service → Service, Role → App, Label → Label, not IPs.
  • Identity Signals — user/group (IdP), device posture (UEM/EDR), service identity (mTLS cert/SPIFFE). → IAM / SSO / MFAMDM / UEMEDR / MDR / XDRPKI
  • Enforcement Planes
  • Host-based (agent/EBPF) — kernel firewall rules by process/service identity.
  • Overlay (service mesh) — sidecar/intent (L7/K8s).
  • Network (fabric/SGT/VLAN/ACL/VXLAN) — fabric tags & ACLs for macro + IoT/OT.
  • Edge (ZTNA/SASE) — per-session allow to a single app.
  • Visibility & Evidence — flow maps from NDR/NetFlow; change/effect logs to SIEM/SOAR. → NDRSIEM / SOAR

🧠 Policy Model (Identity → Device → App → Data → Context)

A rule compiles from intent to controls using five lenses:

  1. Identity — user/service role (group, SPIFFE ID, certificate SAN).
  2. Device posture — EDR/UEM healthy, encryption on, OS ≥ min.
  3. Application — target service/API/port/protocol with L7 awareness.
  4. Data sensitivity — stricter controls for PCI/PHI/CUI; log & watermark on egress. → DLP
  5. Context — site/region/ASN, time window, ticket/change ID, session risk.

Decision outcomes: allow (least-privilege) → step-up (MFA/approval) → isolate (quarantine/read-only) → deny.


🔧 Controls (Concrete & Enforceable)

  • Allow-list by default — explicit intents only; no “any any”.
  • Service Identity — mTLS between services; L7 policy (HTTP method, path, GraphQL schema). → EncryptionPKI
  • Host Enforcement — per-process rules (linux eBPF, Windows Filtering Platform); block inter-tier except declared.
  • Fabric Tags — SGT/labels mapped to ACLs across WAN/DC; carry identity through SD-WAN. → SD-WAN
  • IoT/OT Isolation — profile → tag → minimal allow; deny east-west; mgmt only from jump hosts.
  • Quarantine — NAC/SD-WAN reclassify on risk; ZTNA cuts user session; EDR isolates host. → NACZTNAEDR / MDR / XDR

☁️ Cloud & Kubernetes Patterns

  • Cloud VPC/VNet — security groups + NACLs compiled from labels (env:prod, tier:api, data:restricted).
  • KubernetesNetworkPolicies + service mesh policies; SPIFFE/SVID identity; sidecar mTLS; deny pod-to-pod except intent.
  • Hybrid — unify labels/IDs across DC and cloud; publish the same intents to multiple enforcement backends. → CloudNetworks & Data Centers

🔎 Visibility & Assurance

  • Flow Discovery — learn current comms via NDR/flow; generate candidate intents from observed safe flows. → NDR
  • Simulation / Dry-Run — evaluate proposed policies in observe-only; compare allowed/blocked deltas.
  • Change as Code — policies in git; CI tests (reachability/unit tests) before push.
  • Evidence — enforcement hits, denies, CoA/quarantine, and rule versions stream to SIEM; SOAR captures approvals & rollback.

📐 SLO Guardrails (Experience & Safety You Can Measure)

SLO / KPITarget (Recommended)Notes
Policy compile → push (p95)≤ 60–120 sFrom PR approve to enforcement live
Simulation coverage≥ 95% of flows in dry-runBefore enforce
False-deny rate (after enforce)≤ 1–2%Post-tuning target
Containment (host quarantine)≤ 2–5 min from alertEDR/NAC/ZTNA action
Evidence completeness100% policy versions & hitsLogs to SIEM/SOAR
Platform availability≥ 99.95–99.99%Controllers/agents

SLO breaches trigger SOAR auto-rollback or relaxation of the impacted rules. → SIEM / SOAR


🛠️ Implementation Blueprint (No-Surprise Rollout)

  1. Inventory & Label — apps/services, tiers, environments, data classes; assign labels (env/tier/data/role).
  2. Baseline Flows — capture with NDR/NetFlow; map required comms; flag risky unknown flows. → NDR
  3. Write Intents — “role X → service Y on port/protocol Z”; “service A ↔ service B (L7 path/verb)”.
  4. Simulate — run in observe-only; reconcile denies; commit policy as code with approvals.
  5. Enforce (Rings) — canary services/sites → region rings → global; monitor SLOs; auto-rollback on regression.
  6. Edge & User — pair with ZTNA/SASE to keep users on app-only paths; deny subnet access. → ZTNASASE
  7. Operate & Tune — weekly review of denies/allow drift; retire legacy “any any”; publish diffs/RCAs.

🧭 Reference Patterns (By Outcome)

A) PCI Cardholder Data Environment (CDE)

  • Macro isolate CDE; micro-allow only app↔DB; tokenization for PAN; ZTNA for admin consoles; logs to SIEM for PCI DSS 10. → DLP

B) PHI / Clinical Apps

  • Web↔app↔DB only; break-glass paths with PAM approval + recording; immutable logs for HIPAA. → PAM

C) Dev/Test vs Prod

  • Deny dev→prod; allow CI/CD only via signer/proxy; mTLS service identity; short-lived certs. → PKI

D) IoT/OT Edge

  • Function-based tags; mgmt-only ACLs; no east-west; NDR watch; NAC quarantine on anomaly. → NAC

📜 Compliance Mapping (Examples)

  • PCI DSS — segmentation of CDE, least-privilege, access & log evidence.
  • HIPAA — minimum-necessary network access, audit controls.
  • ISO 27001 — A.13 network security; A.12 operations; A.16 incident mgmt.
  • NIST 800-53/171 — AC/SC families (least privilege, boundary protection).
  • CMMC — CUI enclave segmentation, auditing of allows/denies.

All enforcement events & changes stream to SIEM; SOAR automates rollback and containment.


🔄 Where Microsegmentation Fits (Recursive View)

1) Grammar — flows traverse Connectivity & Networks & Data Centers.
2) Syntax — deployment patterns in Cloud & K8s drive enforcement choices.
3) SemanticsCybersecurity preserves truth; microsegmentation proves least privilege.
4) PragmaticsSolveForce AI predicts risky flows and suggests policy diffs.
5) Foundation — consistent terms via Primacy of Language.
6) Map — indexed across the SolveForce Codex & Knowledge Hub.


📞 Deploy Microsegmentation That’s Safe, Measurable & Auditable

Related pages:
CybersecurityZTNASASENACSD-WANNDREDR / MDR / XDRSIEM / SOARCloudNetworks & Data CentersKnowledge Hub