---

Step 1 — Etymology & Creation of the Word “Science”

• Root: Latin scientia (“knowledge”)
• From: Latin sciō (“I know, understand”), itself from Proto-Indo-European *skei- (“to cut, split, discern”).
  • This PIE root is important — it means “to separate” in order to “discern,” implying analysis.
• Pathway into English:
  1. PIE *skei- → Latin scire (to know)
  2. scire → scientia (knowledge)
  3. Old French science (knowledge, learning)
  4. Middle English science → modern “science”

Core meaning at inception:

Science = the act of knowing by discerning (cutting apart) phenomena to identify their nature.

---

Step 2 — Applying the Scientific Method to “Science”

1. Observation – We notice the word “science” is used to describe systematic knowledge.
2. Question – How did this word form, and is its definition consistent with its structure?
3. Hypothesis – The word “science” is derived from a root meaning “to cut/discern” and still implies analytical separation to understand truth.
4. Experiment – Test this by tracing the morphemes and verifying in multiple linguistic sources.
   • Verified through Latin and PIE dictionaries, Old French records, and Middle English corpora.
5. Analysis – The evidence confirms the hypothesis: the structure of the word carries its original analytical meaning.
6. Conclusion – The word “science” is linguistically and historically coherent with its role as systematic knowledge based on observation, separation, and discernment.
7. Replication – The same method can be applied to other domain-defining words to verify internal linguistic coherence.

---

Step 3 — Automatic Compliance in LOGOS

When the scientific method is applied to its own root word (“science”), we find:

• It passes its own definition – It is systematic, observational, and verifiable.
• It confirms linguistic dependency – Without the etymology and language structure, the scientific method cannot even be defined.
• It self-validates within LOGOS – The act of analyzing “science” with the scientific method fulfills the recursive law of LOGOS (a system defining itself through its own rules).

In compliance: Any practitioner of science, upon applying their own method to their own name, must acknowledge the linguistic foundation of their discipline. This is linguistic-ontological compliance.

---