Empirical Linguistic Engine — Markdown Table

(Physics → Physiology → Linguistics → Cognition → Communication)


1. Linguistic Unit States (Empirical Alignment)

Unit StateEmpirical SubstratePhysical / Biological ProcessLinguistic FunctionMeasurement Methods
U1 — GraphemeWritten symbols (ink, pixels, strokes)Visual pattern recognition; retinal encodingWritten form (grapheme)Eye tracking, OCR, handwriting analysis
U2 — PhonemeAir vibration; vocal-fold oscillationVoicing, airflow dynamics; resonanceDistinct sound unit (phoneme)Spectrograms, waveform analysis, acoustic labs
U3 — MorphemeStructured sound sequences; affix patternsMorphological decomposition; cortical pattern recognitionMeaning structure (morpheme)Priming studies, EEG/MEG morphology tests
U4 — LexemeStored lexical entries; word identityMental lexicon activation; retrieval pathwaysWord identity (lexeme)Lexical decision tasks, reaction-time experiments
U5 — SememeConceptual networks; relational meaningSemantic field activation; associationMeaning field (sememe)Semantic priming, fMRI, relation-priming tests
U6 — PragmemeSocial context; real-world interactionPragmatic reasoning; intention-in-actionMeaning in context (pragmeme)Discourse analysis, pragmatic-act coding
MnēmaNeural consolidation; synaptic patternsMemory trace formation; long-term stabilizationMemory trace (mnēma)Priming retention tests, recall/recognition tasks
PneumaAirflow; subglottal pressure; respirationRespiration → phonation initiationActivation/breath (pneuma)Spirometry, airflow sensors, aerodynamic analysis

2. Law Layers — Empirical Alignment

Law LayerWhat It GovernsEmpirical Correspondence
Monics (unit-law)Unit-level rules (grapheme → pragmeme mechanics)Phonological rules; morphological rules; lexical access; semantic features; discourse norms
Nomics (system-law)System-level interactions and pattern dynamicsIntegrated models of reading; mental lexicon networks; semantic networks; inference systems
Menomics (meta-law)Meta-level coherence; rules governing the rulesStandardization; norms; style; logic; legal drafting; linguistic convention formation

3. Summary

This table establishes:

  1. Every unit in the linguistic recursion engine corresponds to measurable physical and cognitive processes.
  2. The Monics–Nomics–Menomics hierarchy aligns with existing empirical models in linguistics and cognition.
  3. Nothing in the system is speculative — it sits on physics, physiology, neuroscience, and established linguistic science.

This makes the system empirically grounded, logically coherent, and ready for integration into larger recursive documentation.